Quality of business and societal knowledge coproduction with universities:
The Great Recession and the COVID-19 Recession
UIQual is a research project funded by the Valencian Government (AICO/2021/021), from 2021 to 2023
The objetive is to analyse the influence of the Great Recession (started in 2008) and, incipiently, the COVID-19 Recession (2020), on the quality of business and societal science and technology, based on the co-production of research results with universities.
The project is led by
INGENIO (CSIC-UPV)
summary
summary
Companies develop quality research to boost their innovation, be more competitive and attract qualified researchers. However, the quality of companies’ scientific results can be affected by changes in the business cycle. The co-production of scientific knowledge with universities tends to improve the quality of business research, but to the point of offsetting the worst moments of growth cycles? Similarly, the development of quality technology in companies, in particular with universities, may vary in expansions and crises. On the other hand, quality science and technology (S&T) is increasingly nourished by contributions from non-business, non-university organizations, such as NGOs, associations, foundations, etc., or from individuals. The quality of this ‘societal’ S&T is exposed to the same influences as business S&T with respect to business cycles and co-production with universities, an aspect never explored. The objective of this project is to analyse the influence of the Great Recession (started in 2008) and, incipiently, the COVID-19 Recession (starting in 2020), on the quality of business and societal S&T, based on the co-production of research results with universities. Achieving the objective will help to clarify the S&T policy recommendations based on the phase of the economic cycle, mitigate its unwanted effects, revalue the university contribution to the co-production of knowledge and claim the quality of societal S&T. A database on corporate and societal publications and patents will be used, covering the periods before, during and after the Great Recession, up to the COVID-19 Recession. This will allow the identification of key researchers (authors and inventors) on which to carry out case studies, which will serve to inform the theory. The operational measurement of the quality of S&T results will be carried out through the citations received by publications and patents, distinguishing those generated with universities; and that of growth cycles, through the year-on-year increase in gross domestic product. Through a survey, aspects such as facilitating action research, engagement in science communication through art, and fostering the motivation and prosocial behaviour of the research staff will be explored.
Companies develop quality research to boost their innovation, be more competitive and attract qualified researchers. However, the quality of companies’ scientific results can be affected by changes in the business cycle. The co-production of scientific knowledge with universities tends to improve the quality of business research, but to the point of offsetting the worst moments of growth cycles? Similarly, the development of quality technology in companies, in particular with universities, may vary in expansions and crises. On the other hand, quality science and technology (S&T) is increasingly nourished by contributions from non-business, non-university organizations, such as NGOs, associations, foundations, etc., or from individuals. The quality of this ‘societal’ S&T is exposed to the same influences as business S&T with respect to business cycles and co-production with universities, an aspect never explored. The objective of this project is to analyse the influence of the Great Recession (started in 2008) and, incipiently, the COVID-19 Recession (starting in 2020), on the quality of business and societal S&T, based on the co-production of research results with universities. Achieving the objective will help to clarify the S&T policy recommendations based on the phase of the economic cycle, mitigate its unwanted effects, revalue the university contribution to the co-production of knowledge and claim the quality of societal S&T. In addition, geographical and territorial aspects of the relationship between the economic cycle and the co-production of knowledge will be studied. A database on corporate and societal publications and patents will be used, covering the periods before, during and after the Great Recession, up to the COVID-19 Recession. This will allow the identification of key researchers (authors and inventors) on which to carry out case studies, which will serve to inform the theory. The operational measurement of the quality of S&T results will be carried out through the citations received by publications and patents, distinguishing those generated with universities; and that of growth cycles, through the year-on-year increase in gross domestic product. Through a survey, aspects such as combining local and international interests, opening opportunities for interaction for female researchers, and fostering the motivation and prosocial behaviour of the research staff will be explored.
Team
Team
Results
Results
RESEARCHERS LOSE SCIENTIFIC IMPACT IF THEY COMMUNICATE SCIENCE THROUGH ART

After a threshold of scientific impact, the relationship inverts.
With the recognition of artistic practices in the research career, the relationship disappears
A desirable personality in the RESEARCH WORLD translates into higher emotional intelligence

People in the research world can control their emotions through their feelings and their moods
Steady effect of knowledge co-creation with universities on business scientific impact
In crises, business, firms develop higher quality science and benefit from recovery

In expansions, business firms do not rely so much in science and higher growth does not translate into higher quality of their science
Knowledge coproduction with universities fosters the quality of business science steadily throughout the economic cycle
THE ABILITY TO MANAGE EMOTIONS IMPROVES THE MOTIVATION OF RESEARCHERS

Feeling social support makes it easier to channel emotion into motivation, and knowing how to adapt one’s image to what is socially desirable contributes to feeling that support
Action research increases ACADEMIC engagement with stakeholders IN KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STUDIES

Engagement is a source of key concepts and improved interpretation of results in knowledge transfer studies
Joaquín M. Azagra-Caro & Alejandra Boni (2023). Enlarging the knowledge transfer realm through engagement with research stakeholders: a conversation attempt with action research. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 2213596.
CONTRIBUTION OF KNOWLEDGE FROM UNIVERSITIES AND RESEARCH CENTRES TO FIRMS’ INNOVATION COOPERATION

The use of information from universities and research centres fosters firms’ innovation cooperation with local and European partners, especially in economic expansion
WORKSHOP
Transfer, communication and art in science
29 November 2023
Organisers: Joaquín M. Azagra-Caro and Paula Otero-Hermida
This workshop dealt with the use of different channels of university-society interaction:
· Transfer: joint R&D projects, R&D and consultancy contracts, creation of spin-off companies, patent licensing, etc.
· Communication: publication of press articles, appearances in the media, etc.
· Art: creative fiction and non-fiction writing, painting, sculpture, photography, music, theatre, cinema, etc.
The workshop was attended by staff from universities and research centres (such as vice-rectors for culture and art, representatives of research results transfer offices or science communication units, and researchers involved in transfer activities, fiction writing or other artistic activities), as well as directors of science communication companies and representatives from ministries and other areas of gender in science.
Venue: Sala Descubre, 4th floor of the Red Cube of the Polytechnic City of Innovation (Valencia)
Programme
10:00-10:45 Welcome by Jordi Molas, director of INGENIO, and presentation of previous results of the team
· The barriers to transferring knowledge through art in academia
· The need to achieve a certain degree of scientific prestige before being able to share knowledge through art in academia
10:45-11:15 Coffee break
11:15-12.45 Transfer and communication of science: future lines of research
· For business and society, is transfer more useful than communication?
· For researchers, does transfer count more than communication?
· If we study the researchers who do transfer or communication, will we find that they are the same, that if they do one thing they do not do the other, or that there is a bit of everything? And what would be desirable?
· How to compare the social impact of transfer with that of communication? How to compare it by means of a survey? What items to include in a survey?
· Are there problems of public understanding of devolution that require better communication?
12.45-13.00 Break
13.00-14.20 Gender differences: barriers in art for female researchers?
· Why do we think these gender differences occur, what possible inequalities underlie and imply for policy?
14.20-14:30 Brief discussion on co-authorship of a publishable manuscript
SUBSCRIBE
You can write here your email address if you want to receive news and updates on the results of this project
The emails will not be used for any other purpose.
SUBSCRIBE
You can write here your email address if you want to receive news and updates on the results of this project
The emails will not be used for any other purpose.






















